A Country Doctor Writes:

One of the most rewarding things I do in my clinic happens on my iPhone.

When I sit down with a middle aged patient to talk about their cardiovascular risk, I open the risk calculator created by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. I talk my way through as I enter the parameters – age, blood pressure, lipid numbers, smoking history and so on. Then I write down their ten year risk on a piece of paper next to the “ideal” risk for a person that age, for example 8% risk versus ideal 3%.

I explain that statin drugs may lower anybody’s risk by 30-50%, which is more important to consider the higher their risk is, because half of almost nothing is almost nothing.

I also write down the opposite numbers: 92% chance that nothing bad will happen versus 97%. That number, to most patients, seems less dramatic than “almost tripled risk” in the first set of numbers.

Next, I fast forward a few years. Both my patient and Mr. or Ms. Perfect are then older and have a greater risk. I can then also show what the risk would be if they had quit smoking, controlled their blood pressure or developed diabetes during that time.

I write down the new risk numbers with notations of the hypothetical new blood pressure and so on. And inevitably I also end up pointing out that the guideline that accompanies the calculator would have just about every 65 year old, even Mr./Ms. Perfect, take statin drugs. I always get the same incredulous reaction to that one.

Next, I mention the Hale study, which showed that older patients who follow a Mediterranean diet have 50% less cardiovascular disease than people who eat a more typical Western diet. But, of course, maybe the diet choices are also linked to other lifestyle factors.

Lastly, I mention that this calculator does not take family history into consideration.

The conversation this little app generates is, in a way, what medicine today is all about. We have lots of data, but the Art of Medicine is figuring out if and how the statistics apply to an individual patient. And, of course, laying out the options so our patients see them clearly and can decide for themselves.

(For more on lipid guidelines, statins and the Mediterranean diet, check out the video below. More videos at A COUNTRY DOCTOR TALKS.)

There is a deep rooted belief that eating yogurt decreases the risk of vaginal yeast infections from taking broad spectrum antibiotics. This is not an effective strategy. Antibiotics are absorbed through the intestinal tract and are distributed throughout our bodies through the bloodstream. They kill unfriendly bacteria but unfortunately also friendly bacteria, like the normal vaginal flora.

The magic of yogurt is that it contains bacteria that are very similar to the bacteria that normally live in the vagina and keep its environment a little acidic, which deters yeast from growing.

But if anybody thinks yogurt bacteria are absorbed in the intestinal canal and transported throughout or bodies via the bloodstream to the vagina, they are wrong. Such a scenario would basically amount to sepsis, blood poisoning.

However, a little dab of yogurt inside the vagina is the simple, practical way of letting the vaginal flora’s cousins “house sit” until a woman’s own friendly bacteria have a chance to recover from the antibiotic treatment they were subjected to because of a urinary infection or whatever else her medical provider prescribed it for.

That’s how it really works.

Today I saw a woman with a painful toe. She said another doctor used to give her mupirocin, an antibiotic cream, for this recurring painful redness and swelling in one toe she believe suffered a frostbite years ago.

I looked at the toe. The skin was intact, but there was redness, tenderness and a little swelling. I didn’t think topical antibiotics would help that.

“Did the cream work?“ I asked.

“I don’t know, it went away in about a week most of the time but sometimes the toes next to it started to bother also“, she said.

I was sure her flareups resolved on their own and not because of the antibiotic cream she used. It just kept her busy while she waited them out.

Frostbite, recurring pain, inflammation. I have never been shown or diagnosed a case of chilblains before, but the word and the basic concept was in the back of my mind. I remember British people speaking about them. Lately, I have also read that Covid-19 can trigger chilblains.

As I often do, I minimized the EMR on my screen and did a search, this time on up-to-date. I showed her the pictures of toes with chilblains and she agreed with me that they looked like hers and the description of all the symptoms rang a bell with her, too.

The choice seems to be between powerful topical steroids for inflammation or systemic medications including nifedipine, which increases blood flow to cold fingers and toes but could also lower blood pressure. That side effect would be something she could ill afford.

We agreed on a strong topical steroid in ointment form for better penetration and she will let me know how it works for her.

One of the sources I looked up claims that 10% of Brits will experience chilblains in their lifetime. Sweden is colder than Great Britain but perhaps not as damp. I wonder why nobody bothered to tell me about this condition.

What do you do when you get a multi-page letter from an insurance company with care reminders about several patients? I toss it in the shred box.

This is why:

The business model in primary care is that providers are scheduled to see patients all day long. We treat one patient at a time. Anything else, like prescription refills, review of results, answering messages and so on, happens at the expense of scheduled patients’ time with us or our own free time (not-so jokingly called pajama time).

Those care reminders would require me to look up each patient’s chart, review it, consider the recommendation and then maybe create an order and a message to my nurse.

On whose dime? (This is an expression from the era of telephone booths.)

In manufacturing, at least before the recent supply chain meltdown, the concept of just-in-time has been popular. Have raw materials or parts arrive when you need them. That eliminates the need for excessive inventory and storage capacity.

In paper medical records, care reminder letters would have been placed as the first page you see when you open the chart the next time the patient comes in. There is no easy or established way to do that in an EMR. And we are far away from the utopia of having doctors sit at their desks thinking about and directing the care of any patients who are not right in front of their faces.

So, in the reality of today’s work flows, the best I could possibly do would be glance at them and put the “recommendation” in the back of my mind for the next time I see the now normoglycemic diabetic who isn’t on a statin drug. And so on.

If we are supposed to work outside the face-to-face assembly line model, we need our schedules and our tools to be redesigned for such purposes. Until that happens, care reminders and many other things, like population management, are just recipes for physician burnout.

What a year this has been. Our lives continue to be upended, and in many cases cut short, by this novel virus. And our responses include everything from the most sophisticated new medical technologies to medieval strategies. In fact, French Royal physician DeLorme invented PPE in 1619, all the way from clothing that covered the entire body without gaps to the birdlike face mask that filtered the air that plague doctors were breathing. It is almost mind boggling that over 400 years later, we are doing the exact same thing.

But at the same time, the introduction of the Covid mRNA vaccines is equally remarkable. The first gene sequencing, of the RNA virus called Bacteriophage MS2, happened in 1976, when I was in my second year of medical school. And it took from 1990 to 2003 to complete the sequencing of the human genome.

In this strange era of coexisting medieval and space age technologies, I cannot help thinking about the tension between those who embrace both of these strategies and those who deny both. You would think the tension would be between the new and the old ways, but that isn’t as great as the one between all and nothing.

It is as if we have, in this and many western countries, two incompatible world views, like the flat earthers and the rest of us. But in this case, the size of each camp seems to be frighteningly close to equal. And the fervor that is evident in those who want to do nothing to protect themselves from the virus is truly unsettling.

I imagined that mask wearing would be an inoffensive practice, which at least wouldn’t bother anybody else. But no, people get assaulted and harassed for doing it, for making a personal choice to protect themselves.

Many experts are predicting that the pandemic will become endemic and that continued booster shots will contain its lethality. But there are no signs that the tension between the do-somethings and the do-nothings will go away.

Instead of drawing together to fight the invader, the red and blue White American subpopulations have started to view each other as the adversary. I don’t think the insurrection of 1/6/21 would have happened if we hadn’t been in the middle of this pandemic. We are like dogs who suddenly turn on each other instead of attacking the intruder at our gate.

One of these dogs appears to be more aggressive than the other, perhaps even rabid. Or is it just that much more frightened? Not frightened by the virus, but by the Black Lives Matter, Mee-Too and Environmentalist movements they see as threats to their “Freedom”, which they believe they will lose if others gain theirs.

It seems this virus was a catalyst for a chemical, cultural chain reaction whose end product is as of yet unknown. We are witnessing incompatible progress and regression rapidly reshaping and destabilizing this country.

God bless America. God help America.