A Country Doctor Writes:

First, a side comment about languages. I was taught British English and there, a T is a T and a D is a D, but in American English that distinction is minimal. So this headline, when spoken, could easily give the illusion that I ride horses. I have horses, but I just keep them and spoil them, I do not ride them. But that is a side issue. The relevance here is that since I was sick most of February with a little horse farm, I still had to do all the heavy manual labor that goes with it.

I did not get much writing done during February because of my prolonged influenza (in spite of my vaccination) and its slow recovery. I was not able to fully disengage from my work during my illness because we are a fairly lean outfit here in Maine. That took a lot out of me.

So please accept my apologies and know that I have several pieces percolating and started that will be published in the coming days.

So I did not fall off the face of the earth, and I did not lose my desire to share my experiences and reflections as a country doctor in this fairly remote area. Stay tuned.

I listened to a couple of Blinkist book summaries tonight. Even though I knew of Kierkegaard as the father of existentialism, I did not understand that there was some humor and humanity in his writings.

His first major work, published 1843 in Danish under the pseudonym Victor Eremita (suggestively similar to the Danish word for hermit, eremit), was titled Enten/Eller, Either/Or.

It contrasts aesthetic, his word for hedonistic, versus ethical views of life and states neither is all good, and whatever we choose, we will have to deal with the anxiety of our choices. The hedonist tries to escape their guilt by more hedonistic acts while the ethicist feels anxious by whatever degree of self-denial they have.

In the end he points out that the human condition is messy and unfair and we have to accept its unfairness and absurdity with a sense of humor.

I was surprised by his claim that living an ethical life would create anxiety. It’s easier for me to see that hedonism can lead to anxiety and attempts to sink deeper into their pathology (which Nietzsche saw as the new way of ruling the word). Link to my piece about that below. Meanwhile, I’m thinking of writing about anxiety and my lack of it on my personal Substack soon.

Beyond Good and Evil: Nietzsche Foresaw the Übermenschen of Today

I got an ominous looking fax in my electronic inbox today. WellCare was notifying me that my oxygen dependent COPD patient’s concentrator rental was going to be terminated because her “plan limit for home oxygen rental is 36 months. You have used 36 months rental of this service and would be eligible for new equipment 3/22/28 if needed”.

It was 10 minutes before 5 on this Thursday afternoon. I called the oxygen company and they answered in a cryptic way “Medicare only pays for 36 months, that is correct“.

“So what do people do“, I asked, “go without? Die?”

“We don’t take their equipment away“, the woman at Lincare said.

“You just don’t get paid then”, I asked.

“Correct“, she answered.

I love it when I learn something new about the practice of medicine. But most of the time when I learn a new aspect of how the “system” works, it just feels bewildering because it makes no sense. Wouldn’t anybody think that the rent per month would go up so as to cover the service and maintenance during the 3 1/2 years that go by after the 18 months of Medicare payments stop?

I once had a separate WordPress blog, and I think im still paying for the domain ”A Country Doctor Reads”, where I wrote bout my eclectic reding, not only from medical journals, but also from major news media, business journals and even Swedish newspapers. I later made it a post category here on A Country Doctor Writes.

It occurred to me to check if today, here and now, there is any interest in occasional posts on this theme. Comments are welcome. Check out this example from 2019:

A Country Doctor Reads: January 13, 2019

The other day, I saw a senior citizen for an annual wellness visit. He is a well controlled diabetic. One of the quality parameters that gets me brownie points and brings extra money to my practice is that we document an eye exam, a kidney function blood test and a urine test to look for the early warning signs of diabetic kidney disease. We are also judged on whether he takes a statin drug to lower his heart attack risk, regardless of what his cholesterol numbers are and that his blood pressure is within range.

We only got his urine test done a couple months ago, near the end of 2025. When I did his wellness visit the other day he had received a urine cup from his insurance company. I told him that it would be kind of silly to do that test now because he had it just a couple months ago. He should really have it toward the end of the year. If he doesn’t do it by then I will get dinged, but if he does it now it’s going to be fine and it wouldn’t serve any medical purpose. This is a common dilemma in today’s medicine. Do we do things that make medical sense or do we do things to chase? What in the industry is called “star ratings“?

So here’s a question for my colleagues: Would you have done the urine test now just to get the points or would you do it a year from when you did your last one?