Archive Page 205

What Do I Call You, Doc?

Physicians play different roles for different people and in different situations. We fix, educate, nurture, counsel, and sometimes just comfort. We inevitably broadcast our own feelings and values through our words, gestures and physical appearance.

Sometimes patients put us in the same sort of role as clergy; sometimes we take on a parental role.

I often see colleagues who insist on being called “Doctor”, even in non-medical situations. I also have colleagues in nearby towns that dress very casually and insist that patients call them by first name.

In the past few years I have read several articles about patients’ expectations and preferences in physician dress and titulature. The message seems to be that patients tend to prefer their doctors to be a bit on the conservative side.

Since I work in a small clinic, and also because I have been here for a long time, most people I see in my capacity as a physician know that I am a doctor. When I walk into the exam room, dressed in cuffed wool slacks, a crisp shirt and tie and an embroidered, long white lab coat with a stethoscope sticking out from my right coat pocket, I introduce myself by first and last name. I have never had anybody ask me if I really was a doctor in that situation. When I introduce myself to a child, I say, ” I am Doctor X—-“.

Some patients respond to my first-and-last-name greeting by repeating my first name and their pleasure in doing so doesn’t offend me. I simply let the patient decide how to address me, just the way I have to deal with what role they need me as a doctor to play in their illness or in their life.

I have found that even the most sophisticated patients appreciate when I speak plain English. I only use technical terms when I can introduce them and explain them; I never assume my patient is familiar with them.

I have found that comparing the workings of the human body to motors, household appliances and other everyday things helps establish a rapport with my patients and ensures I don’t get misunderstood.

One pet peeve I have is when doctors call patients by first name and themselves “Doctor”. I always found that to sound very disrespectful. We must be respectful of patients, who entrust us with their bodies and allow us to see their suffering and their fears.

Most patients are very respectful of me in return, except for the fact that many have trouble pronouncing my name; many adults and children alike call me by the initial of my last name, which, I guess, is a term of endearment in a way.

A Change of Heart

It was the day before Christmas 1996, and Betsy Billings was not the type to run to the doctor unnecessarily. She had been unusually busy since Thanksgiving, trying to get ready for Christmas, and the virus she had come down with in November seemed to have left her with a profound sense of fatigue.

For a few days she had noticed ankle swelling, which brought her to the office on Christmas Eve.

Betsy had always been a bright, cheerful woman, who seemed to take everything in stride. She spoke in a high-pitched, youthful voice at age 50, had a contagious smile that included a peculiar way of squinting, and she had the funniest way of acting out what she talked about, almost like playing charades.

Her leg edema was significant, and there was deep pitting that persisted after I removed my fingers. Her neck veins were a little distended, and her heart was enlarged on her chest x-ray. She admitted to sleeping on two pillows because of shortness of breath when lying flat, and she had put on weight.

I started her on fluid pills that day and ordered an echocardiogram. Her EKG didn’t look like she’d had a heart attack.

That day was the beginning of a long journey for Betsy, who almost to the day ten years later had to rush to Boston when her pager went off in the middle of the night because a donor heart was available.

During the ten years between her diagnosis of cardiomyopathy and her heart transplant she required more and more tinkering with her medications. She was my first patient on carvedilol, a beta-blocker specifically introduced for use in heart failure. When I was in medical school, beta-blockers were contraindicated in heart failure. When carvedilol was first introduced, patients had to be kept in the office to be monitored for dropping blood pressure after their first dose.

In the beginning of Betsy’s journey, I had to double check things with our local cardiologists, and as time went along, my backup shifted to her transplant team in Boston.

The transplant happened quicker than we had expected, because of the availability of a perfect donor match. During the next several months I didn’t see Betsy at all; I just got the reports from Boston.

When I first saw her after her surgery she was on high-dose prednisone and all kinds of immunosuppressants to prevent rejection. It was a strange experience. She was a changed woman. She was physically changed from the steroids, and she had none of her usual cheerfulness and optimism. She doubted she could ever lose the weight she had gained, and she suffered from anxiety I had never seen in her before.

The obvious explanation was the steroids; I have seen before how steroids can change a person’s psychological makeup. But in Betsy’s situation, I couldn’t help but wonder what it does to a human being to have another person’s heart beating in their chest. I don’t know that all of our personality is located in our brain, with all the talk about cellular memory and other such things we hear about today.

During Betsy’s first year of living with a new heart, and while on steroids, she struggled less successfully than before with her weight issues. She had a minor spending spree on one of the TV shopping networks, and her husband, Robbie, was sometimes perplexed by her moods. She even asked to be referred to a psychiatrist.

Last month I saw her again, and she looked great. She was on a low dose of prednisone, needed almost no heart medications, and mostly came to see me for a flu shot and some routine lab tests. She told me about her August vacation trip, when she had rented a bicycle and for the first time since she got sick gone on a bicycle picnic with her sister.

As she spoke, tears streamed down her cheeks, and her funny little squint was back. She made little body movements like charades again, and I saw the Betsy I had known before her transplant. She’s a new woman in a way, but also back to her old self.

A Nice, Clean Doublewide

Driving back from town this evening, I noticed that Marguerite Brown’s old farmhouse was gone. For two years now, Marguerite has been talking about how the old homestead was to be torn down, but there never seemed to be a timeline.

Two years ago, just before winter, Marguerite announced proudly that she wasn’t spending another winter in that cold, drafty old farmhouse of hers. I had been there years before and remembered it as untouched pre-world war II. The kitchen floor was made of unfinished narrow pine boards, the wooden cabinets were naturally darkened by age, and the woodstove was the only source of heat in that part of the house. The old furnace blew some hot air into the main portion of the house, but here, too, woodstoves made the temperature more bearable on cold evenings.

After Marguerite’s husband passed away, she took in a succession of old men as boarders. They got taken care of, and I’m sure it worked for Marguerite, too. That’s how I came to see the inside of her house, doing house calls for the elderly men she took care of. A few years ago, she gave up doing that, and soon after, she started talking about not wanting to spend winters in that house anymore. Like many people around here, she decided to get “a nice, clean doublewide”, essentially two mobile homes joined into one after delivery.

She sold the acreage in the way back of her property, had her new doublewide put up behind the old farmhouse, and for a couple of years, she chipped away at going through its contents.

“You can’t imagine how much junk you gather in sixty years”, she told me. She loved her doublewide, and she often told me how glad she was to be out of her old house, but she seemed to take an awfully long time going through its contents and getting ready for its demolition. I suspected it wasn’t just a matter of going through the physical contents of the house, but also saying goodbye to the memories of the place where she spent all of her adult life, raised her children, grew old, nursed her husband through the illness that took his life, cared for a succession of elderly boarders, and then spent years alone.

Three weeks ago her eldest daughter, Molly, succumbed to pancreatic cancer. As I drove past the pile of rubble that was left of Marguerite’s house today, I wondered if losing her first born child made her finally tear down the old homestead. One more painful memory associated with it…

When I saw her last, she had asked out loud why her daughter had to die, and not her. Then she had added: “No parent should have to bury a child”.

The house where Marguerite Brown lived all her adult life, raised her children and became a widow finally got torn down this week, but as she looks out the front window of her “nice, clean doublewide” I wonder if she still won’t see it, even now that it’s gone.

A Train Wreck* With Two Car Wrecks

(* American medical slang for a patient with major medical problems)

Carlos Sanchez was lucky to have survived the accident. His almost brand new car was totaled, and he was taken to the hospital, strapped on a rigid back board with a cervical collar. No fractures were found; he was sore all over, and didn’t remember much of the accident, but it was the first snowstorm of the winter and it was assumed he had driven too fast for the road conditions and simply lost control of his car. I signed the copy of his emergency room report and his chart went back to our clinic’s medical records room.

One week later, Carlos’ chart was on my desk again. This time, he totaled his rental car, and again he escaped serious injury. What an unusual thing to happen, I thought. Carlos seemed like such a slow-moving, sensitive young man; why would he be out crashing cars every week? I signed off on his report, and his chart went back to be filed again.

The next day was Friday and I was looking forward to my weekend off. My wife and I were planning a trip to town for some Christmas shopping and a late dinner at our favorite restaurant.

Just before five o’clock, Carlos showed up at the front desk and said, “I just don’t feel good”.

I took one look at him, and agreed with his assessment; he just wasn’t right. He had some sort of encephalopathy, that was clear, and he had an unusual pale, yellow coloring. My wife came to join me, and we headed up to town, with Carlos willingly in the back seat. We swung by the emergency room, dropped him off with a few words exchanged with the clinician on duty.

The final diagnosis was acute kidney failure; he was admitted, underwent emergency dialysis, and some time later received a kidney transplant. Last year he rejected his new kidney, so he is back on dialysis, waiting for another kidney.

The moral of the story is that even car accidents during the first snowstorm of the season may happen for a reason, and when someone has two car wrecks in a short period of time, the onus is on the treating physician to ask why.

The Concept of Risk

In the old days, doctors treated patients who sought medical care because they had symptoms they wanted to get rid of. Then came medical treatment of easily measured physical parameters, like high blood pressure, even when not associated with splitting headaches and red cheeks. A normal blood pressure is essentially the same number for everyone. Recently, we have spent a lot of time and energy treating risk factors, like elevated cholesterol.

I find a lot of my patients have trouble thinking about risk; many still think of what we do as treating disease. For example, the National Cholesterol Education Program has set target values for the bad LDL-cholesterol. According to NCEP, a low risk person, for example a twenty-five year old non-smoking woman with ideal weight and blood pressure, has little reason to worry about a mildly “elevated” LDL, whereas a sixty-five year old diabetic chain-smoking man with a history of poor circulation in his legs with the same LDL number would be an obvious candidate for aggressive lipid lowering efforts.

As I counsel patients about cardiovascular risk, I usually first calculate their risk according to the Framingham Heart Study data, then I show how the presence or absence of inflammation, as measured by Highly Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (CRP), can tip the scales. My last step has been to look at the NCEP guidelines with the patient. I have found that not all my colleagues do the same – some seem to look at elevated cholesterol with less attention to individual risk.

Today the author of the original CRP study has published a study showing upwards of 50% reduction in heart attacks and strokes among people with normal cholesterol but with elevated CRP levels, when taking the cholesterol-lowering drug rosuvastatin (Crestor).

This is essentially the same risk reduction we have seen in traditional high risk (high LDL-cholesterol) patients. But bear with me here: Half of all heart attacks occur among a “relatively small” number of people with high cholesterol, and the remainder of all heart attacks occur among the much larger group of people with fairly normal cholesterol. Reducing heart attack risk by half does mean more for someone with a 25% risk of heart disease than for someone with a 5% risk.

My first read of the JUPITER study is that you have to provide as many as 300 patient-years of medication to high-CRP patients with normal LDL-cholesterol to prevent one heart attack. The JUPITER study saw 142 heart “events” (including not only heart attacks, but also strokes, hospital admissions for angina and elective coronary stenting) among 8,000 Crestor-treated patients and 251 heart events among 8,000 placebo treated individuals. That means the untreated group had a 3% risk of having an “event” during the study period of two years.

Any time you prescribe medication to someone who isn’t terribly ill, you have to stop and consider whether you might be trading one problem for another. A person with pneumonia or cancer will clearly tolerate all kinds of medication risks and even side effects in order to save their life, but a person who is more likely to live out their life free from heart disease should be more concerned about the long term safety of medications prescribed to lower their already low risk of having a heart attack.

One of my professors in medical school once gave a talk about blood pressure medications I still refer to today when talking to patients. He said that a good blood pressure medication should be effective, inexpensive, and side effect free, because high blood pressure is dangerous, common, and generally asymptomatic. Said differently, the treatment must really work, it must be easily available to all who need it, and you cannot ask people who feel well to take a medication that makes them feel bad.

The statin drugs were first developed in the 1970’s and it took many years before they became widely used. There are still enough unanswered questions about their very-long-term safety to make us think hard about when they are worth using and when they are not.

The night I suffered my vitreous detachment during my visit to Sweden a couple of months ago, I noticed the spider web visual distortions as I looked out my aunt’s living room window and saw he Astra-Zeneca pharmaceutical plant in the distance. It had come up in our conversation as they had laid off many workers shortly before my visit.

Maybe Astra-Zeneca will do better now – Comments I read suggest that it may cost up to half a million dollars worth of Crestor at $3.50 per pill to save one life in the lower risk group in the JUPITER study. Yes, we’re talking health care in a way. Health care is really big business these days, but still delivered one patient at a time.


I just realized none of the posts show on an iPad or a computer, but they do show on an iPhone. WordPress is working on this. In the meantime, please visit my Substack.

 

 

Osler said “Listen to your patient, he is telling you the diagnosis”. Duvefelt says “Listen to your patient, he is telling you what kind of doctor he needs you to be”.

 

BOOKS BY HANS DUVEFELT, MD

CONDITIONS, Chapter 1: An Old, New Diagnosis

Top 25 Doctor Blogs Award

Doctor Blogs

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Mailbox

contact @ acountrydoctorwrites.com
Bookmark and Share
© A Country Doctor Writes, LLC 2008-2022 Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given.