A Country Doctor Writes:

I was in a science track on my way to medical school so my philosophy education was not in-depth. But I am rereading Nietzsche and thinking OMG…

I have been with Blinkist for many months now and really enjoy listening to their book summaries when I’m resting or driving. Sometimes, after listening to a summary there, I will buy the book on audible or in print. This is what happened after I listened to Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil. I just opened the package that came last week. It’s a small, hard cover volume that looks old, even though it is brand new. 

Here’s Google’s AI summary (I just realized it is more than a little different every time I come back to it…) of the central ideas in Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil. I have to say it sounds a lot like some of what is going on today with the widening gaps in resources and influence between the elite and the masses, whose opposite moralities he calls “master morality” and “slave morality”. 

I really do think our culture has moved exactly where Nietzsche predicted and wanted it to go.

“The central idea in Nietzsche’s “Beyond Good and Evil” is that traditional morality, with its rigid classifications of “good” and “evil,” is flawed and should be rejected, as there are no universal truths and individuals should instead strive to create their own values based on their unique perspective and will to power, essentially going “beyond good and evil.”. 

Key points about this central idea:

Critique of established morality:

Nietzsche criticizes philosophers for blindly accepting traditional moral systems, arguing that they are often based on the perspective of the weak and resentful, rather than the strong and creative. 

Will to Power:

A core concept where individuals are driven by an inherent desire to dominate and express their own power, which can be seen as a force beyond conventional morality. 

Perspectivism:

Nietzsche argues that all truths are subjective and depend on the individual’s perspective, meaning there is no single “correct” morality. 

The “Noble Soul”:

Nietzsche envisions a higher type of person who embraces their own will to power and creates their own values, rising above the herd mentality.”

https://open.substack.com/pub/hansduvefeltmd/p/beyond-good-and-evil-nietzsche-foresaw?r=254ice&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

The news about measles in Texas brought back memories from when I worked at the Student Health Center at the University of Maine in Orono back in the early 90s. We had a significant outbreak then. Just about all the students who got sick had been vaccinated as young children and had mild symptoms. The rashes were fairly subtle in some of them. Our nurses and my physician colleagues often called on me to help confirm the diagnosis, since I was the only one who had ever seen a case, in fact several, during medical school and residency in Sweden 1974-1981

Sweden got its first measles vaccine in 1971, but it wasn’t widely adopted. In 1982, a two dose regimen was introduced, combined with the mumps and rubella vaccines (MMR).

In the US, the first measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, followed by an improved version in 1968.

After a big measles outbreak among vaccinated school children here in 1989, two doses were recommended and the MMR was introduced.

Since I was born before 1957, I am presumed immune to all the common childhood viruses we are now vaccinating against. The philosophy then was, get it over and done with, so children were purposely exposed to sick children, especially chicken pox. These occasions were called “pox parties”. I remember being told, both before and during medical school that it would be good to get mumps before puberty and especially before adulthood, because mumps sometimes doesn’t just affect our large parotid salivary glands but also a man’s testicles (ouch).

Here’s a piece I wrote in 2014 about illnesses with rashes:

A Rash of Rashes

Invisible Ties

Read the back story here:

https://acdw.substack.com/p/the-back-story-invisible-ties

I think it was Adam Cifu who made me curious to read more of Dr. Herbert L. Fred’s writings. It was one word that started me on this journey, a brand new word, minted in 2005: “Hyposkillia, Deficiency of Clinical Skills”.

Many forces have created this modern epidemic. The availability and reliance on advanced imaging and more or less affordable laboratory panels have replaced old fashioned history taking and physical exam skills. The corporate demands on physicians’ time have de-prioritized our cognitive skills. It is faster to order a bunch of tests than to take a thorough history and physical exam, and the tests we order instead are fueling the big business of the healthcare industry.

I remember during my Swedish internship I was called down to see the Chief of Radiology. “Duvefelt, you’re ordering too many x-rays”, he said. Our hospital didn’t have a CT scanner yet, so this was not about very expensive tests. His concern was mostly my orders for simple chest x-rays. I also remember learning physical exam skills at Uppsala University, taught by older pulmonologists, who could predict what a chest x-ray would look like after their thorough physical exam with inspection, palpation, percussion and auscultation.

Dr. Fred didn’t really think in 2005 that it would be possible to turn the clock back to when doctors practiced Oslerian bedside medicine. He thought that the skill set, particularly among generalists, had already been lost. And now we are twenty years further down this path.

The only place where that skill set may be called for is perhaps the kind of practice I am in, housecalls and telemedicine for patients who have great difficulty leaving their homes for CT scans, MRIs, echocardiograms and EEGs.

Telemedicine in general may also be an area where a physician’s history taking skill is getting better recognition. I wrote about this on KevinMD five years ago in the early months of the COVID pandemic.

How I Write